Enhancing Numeracy Skills of the Kindergarteners Using Modified
Cover-Copy-Compare Strategy

Michelle Melinda B. Alzate
mmalzate@asist.edu.ph
Abra State Institute of Sciences and Technology
Lagangilang, Abra, Philippines

Remedios C. Felipe
Janine Mae A. Fernandez
Desiree Kaye C. Turqueza
Keith Gwynet B. Tuscano
Jharmaigne P. Valdez
Abra State Institute of Sciences and Technology

ABSTRACT
This study aimed to determine the level of numeracy skills of kindergarteners using the modified cover-copy-compare (CCC) strategy. Specifically, it determined the level of performance of the kindergarteners before and after the integration of the modified cover-copy-compare strategy and the significant difference between their levels of performance of the kindergarteners. The study employed a descriptive-experimental research design, and the respondents were 30 kindergarteners from St. Ignatius de Loyola School, Inc., Bangued, Abra. The data gathered were statistically treated using the weighted mean and the t-test for two dependent means. Based on the data gathered, it was found that the level of numeracy skills of the kindergarteners in the pre-test was “Above Average,” while “Excellent” in the post-test. There is also a significant difference between the level of performance of the kindergarteners in the pre-test and post-test. Based on the findings, it is concluded that: 1) Kindergarteners can more than sufficiently add and subtract single-digit numbers using numerical figures. 2) The CCC strategy is an effective tool for enhancing the numeracy skills of kindergarteners, particularly in the addition and subtraction of single-digit numbers. Therefore, it is recommended that: 1) Varied visual learning tools and activities that connect numerical concepts with images may be integrated to help bridge the gap between understanding numerical concepts and writing numerals; and 2) Regular assessments may be conducted to monitor the progress of students’ numeracy skills, ensuring that the modified cover-copy-compare strategy continues to be effective and making adjustments as necessary to meet individual learning needs.

KEYWORDS
Numeracy Skills, Kindergarteners, Cover-Copy-Compare

REFERENCES

  1. Ulidan, D.C. (2018). Mother Tongue Instruction of PEPILAQUIN District, Schools Division of Abra. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College.
  2. Blake Harvard is an AP Psychology teacher at James Clemens High School in Madison, Ala. His blog (www.effortfuleducator.com) focuses on the application of cognitive psychology in the classroom.
  3.  Bolich, B., Kawon, N., McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, R. L., & Urlacher, S. (1995). The effects of a copy, cover, compare procedure and a token economy on the retention of basic multiplication facts by two middle school students with ADD and ADHD. British Columbia Journal of Special Education,19(1), 1–10.
  4.  Brandt, C., Bassoi, T. and Baccon, A. (2016) Difficulties of 6th Grade Elementary School Students in Solving the Four Basic Fundamental Operations: Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, and Division of Natural Numbers. Creative Education, 7, 1820-1833.
  5.  Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., & Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-analysis of math intervention with cover-copy-compare and mnemonic techniques. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(2), 170-190.
  6.  Codding, R. S., Archer, J., & Connell, J. (2010). A systematic replication and extension of the cover-copy-compare intervention to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 643-653.
  7.  Codding, R. S., Chan-Iannetta, L., Palmer, M., & Lukito, G. (2009). Examining a classwide application of cover-copy-compare with and without goal setting to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 173 185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017192
  8.  Codding, R. S., Volpe, R. J., & Poncy, B. C. (2015). A 12-year review of the cover copy-compare intervention to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 508-517.
  9.  Codding, R. S., Eckert, T. L., Fanning, E., Shiyko, M., & Solomon, E. (2007). Comparing mathematics interventions: The effects of cover-copy-compare alone and combined with performance feedback on digits correct and incorrect. Journal of Behavioralhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9006-x
  10.  Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. St. Martin’s Press. 
  11.  Gee, J. P. (2017). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  12.  Gómez-Varela, A. I., et al. (2019). A study of educational games: Engagement and learning. Computers & Education, 142, 103642.
  13.  Harris, B., & Petersen, D. (2019). Developing math skills in early childhood [PDF].
  14.  Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2019). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Mathematica. https://www.edimpactlab.com/downloadmedia?MediaItemId =%7B3360C48F-576D-44A8-AB63-EA259BABC359%7D
  15.  Lambert, M. C., Algozzine, B., & Schmid, R. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of the cover-copy-compare strategy in middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(4), 306-318.
  16.  Miller, S., & Robertson, J. (2015). Educational game design: Designing for video game-based learning. ETC Press.
  17.  Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2019). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth-grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 166-178.
  18.  Peng, P., et al. (2016). Early mathematics achievement trajectories: English-speaking Caribbean and low- and middle-income countries. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1426–1440.
  19.  Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of Game-Based Learning.
  20.  Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Review. (2020). The effectiveness of PjBL in early education: A meta-analysis. Educational Review, 72(4), 516-536.
  21.  Purpura, D. J., et al. (2017). Early mathematics screening and intervention: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 49–58.
  22.  Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Duncan, R. J. (2021). Early numeracy skills and later achievement: Examining the roles of early competencies and instructional practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 534 548. 
  23.  Ramani, G. B., et al. (2015). Learning from number board games: You learn what you encode. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1210–1218.
  24.  Roschelle, J. (2013). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate algebraic reasoning. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.), Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children (pp. 261–284). Routledge.
  25.  Smith, J. (2018). Creating Effective Learning Environments: Insights from Research and Practice.
  26.  Stahl, G. (2015). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.
  27.  Sweller, J., et al. (2019). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory for the design of learning. Cambridge University Press.
  28.  Tudge, J., & Caruso, D. (2015). The everyday lives of young children: Culture, class, and child-rearing in diverse societies. Cambridge University Press